<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Anathem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thejamesreview.com/review-anathem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thejamesreview.com/review-anathem/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=review-anathem</link>
	<description>book reviews by james m. toburen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james m. toburen</title>
		<link>http://thejamesreview.com/review-anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>james m. toburen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejamesreview.com/?p=717#comment-92</guid>
		<description>I empathize with your sense of hesitancy. Anathem is a daunting book to pick up. I love Neal Stephenson, but I feel the same way about The Baroque Cycle. I have not yet decided if I&#039;m willing to commit to three thousand pages of DENSE prose set in the 1600s.

I have an indescribable love for Anathem, but the difficulty other reviewers have with the novel makes sense. Most of the reviews I&#039;ve read have been very polarized, which I understand, as popular appeal is an attribute Anathem lacks. My personal recommendation: if you enjoyed Robert Heinlein (his hard science stuff, not the freaky incest stuff), then Anathem should be right up your alley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I empathize with your sense of hesitancy. Anathem is a daunting book to pick up. I love Neal Stephenson, but I feel the same way about The Baroque Cycle. I have not yet decided if I&#8217;m willing to commit to three thousand pages of DENSE prose set in the 1600s.</p>
<p>I have an indescribable love for Anathem, but the difficulty other reviewers have with the novel makes sense. Most of the reviews I&#8217;ve read have been very polarized, which I understand, as popular appeal is an attribute Anathem lacks. My personal recommendation: if you enjoyed Robert Heinlein (his hard science stuff, not the freaky incest stuff), then Anathem should be right up your alley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misty</title>
		<link>http://thejamesreview.com/review-anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Misty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejamesreview.com/?p=717#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still debating whether I want to read this one.  I loved Snow Crash (a lot), but I&#039;ve read mixed reviews of this, and it&#039;s so long, especially for writing described as &#039;dense&#039;.  It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t think I could handle it, necessarily, just a question of whether I want to, you know?
Great review, though. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still debating whether I want to read this one.  I loved Snow Crash (a lot), but I&#8217;ve read mixed reviews of this, and it&#8217;s so long, especially for writing described as &#8216;dense&#8217;.  It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t think I could handle it, necessarily, just a question of whether I want to, you know?<br />
Great review, though. <img src='http://thejamesreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

