Jeff VanderMeer’s City of Saints and Madmen is a sometimes bewildering collection of works related to the fictional city of Ambergris. Almost immediately, it becomes apparent that this is not your typical fantasy; instead, VanderMeer’s literature is a bizarre amalgamation of fantasy, horror, and postmodern literary techniques. This fusion of genres is called “new weird,” described by Vandermeer in the introduction of (surprise, surprise!) The New Weird anthology:
The first edition of City of Saints and Madmen included the World Fantasy Award Winning “The Transformation of Martin Lake,” as well as “Dradin, In Love,” “An Early History of Ambergris,” and “The Strange Case of X.” These four novellas comprise the “core” of the book; however, more recent editions have added almost a dozen additional pieces, including an “appendiX” that purports itself as belonging to the aforementioned mental patient, “X.” The original novellas are moody, dark, and gripping; unfortunately, the content included in the appendix varies from harrowing to yawn-inducing. Over 700 pages, Jeff VanderMeer spins a tangled and bewildering web, and there are intriguing moments of brilliance that refuse to surrender their hold on the reader, but the collection, as a whole, suffers from an unwillingness to remove material that serves little purpose other than to amuse the author.
City of Saints and Madmen, more than anything, explores a strange metropolis, a shadowy, gruesome, and fungus-infested nightmare, certainly no place I would ever want to inhabit. Actually, I’m not certain why anyone would want to live there; few of the stories give any indication as to why the citizens continue to choose this haunted and dangerous city as their residence (other than the multiple antagonists living in mental institutions, who obviously have fewer decisions to worry about in regards to their lodgings). Regardless, the triumphs and (more often) torments of the city’s residents expose a window through which we see the streets, bookstores, taverns, and museums of Ambergris, a port that evokes both Paris’ bohemian excitement and the mysterious threats of Istanbul’s cluttered alleys. Each of the novellas and stories follow individuals going about their often nightmarish lives, but the true star of the show is the city of Ambergris, an enchanting horror that will occupy your thoughts, and likely your dreams, long after you’ve finished reading.
The opening novella, “Dradin, In Love,” follows a missionary returning to Ambergris after sickness and strife deep in tropical jungles. In the window of a street-side business, a woman of heart-stopping beauty captures Dradin’s heart; as the city prepares for the madness of The Festival of the Freshwater Squid, an unstable Dradin himself descends into an all-consuming obsession. “An Early History of Ambergris” is an amusingly cynical and dry recounting of the early horrors of Ambergrisian history. In “The Transformation of Martin Lake,” alternating narratives explore the darker motivations behind artistry, split between a biographical analysis of the successful painter Martin Lake and a recounting of the young, struggling artist’s literal invitation to an execution. The concluding “The Strange Case of X” tells a somewhat clichéd and obvious author-trapped-in-his-own-work fable, and is the weakest of the four original elements. Outside of these four pieces, the quality varies widely. “King Squid,” while humorous at times, is more frustrating than anything else, being an exploration of the behavior and biology of, you guessed it: the King Squid. Particularly annoying is slogging through a 40-page bibliography, interspersed with personal commentary from an increasingly deranged narrator; while vaguely clever, the entire endeavor feels fundamentally pointless. In addition, a 70-page glossary may be delightfully self-referential and cast several of the stories in a new light, but also feels unnecessary. But fear not; all is not lost! “The Hoegbotton Family History,” which I fully expected to be adynamic, was quite moving, with one of the most beautiful finishing paragraphs I’ve ever had the pleasure of reading. Likewise, “The Exchange,” “The Cage,” and “In the Hours After Death” all entertained, each of them a unique, slow-motion free-fall into uncertainty and madness. Like all anthologies, some works are going to appeal more than others, and perhaps the vignettes I found drab or uninspired will speak differently to another reader.
However, when the pacing falters, truly extraordinary prose helps to maintain the tension and wonder of Saints and Madmen. Even from the opening passage, it’s crystal-clear that vanilla narrative won’t be enough to satisfy the pressing needs of these stories: “Dradin, in love, beneath the window of his love, staring up at her while crowds surge and seethe around him, bumping and bruising him all unawares in their rough-clothed, bright-rouged thousands.” The language is simply incredible–VanderMeer combines the sensous, the humorous, and the lyrical with ease–and each piece has an inflection and continuity unique to itself. Even in the segments that I found less than satisfying, I was simply stunned by the power of his writing. Ultimately, the postmodern approach may not interest every reader, but I am hard-pressed to imagine that any reader would not be astonished by the clarity of VanderMeer’s voice. Even for readers who might struggle with the compilation’s uneven pacing or sometimes unsympathetic narrators, I would still recommend this novel on the strength of the language alone.
City of Saints and Madmen is a pioneering work of fiction, and I admire VanderMeer’s willingness to go it alone in a strange direction that may not prove to be financially rewarding (not that I am implying that financial success is the only, or even the best, measuring stick), but I have a hard time imagining this anthology will appeal to a broad audience, which is a shame, because there are moments of unbelievable brilliance, moments that left my jaw on the ground and my brain stranded at the last station’s stop. Jeff VanderMeer has obviously devoted an incredible amount of effort to inventing this fantastical city, whether it be merely for pleasure or because Ambergris haunts him as deeply as the stranded author in “The Strange Case of X.” In either case, I am fascinated by the events hinted at throughout and my curiosity seems destined to lead me to Shriek: An Afterword and Finch. While the collection’s pacing is uneven and certain portions seem included only to divert the author and those readers with an interest obsessive enough to pick out every interconnected reference, the fabulous prose and the slavish attention to every nightmarish detail make for a very entertaining read.
Plot: 6.5
Characters: 8.5
Action: 8
Writing: 10
Overall (not an average): 7.5/10







Rest assured the Ambergris sequence gets a hell of a lot better from here on out, James. I’ve landed a copy of Finch for a review on TSS myself and I can hardly wait. If it’s better than Shriek, and that’s the buzz, then it’s got to be incredible.
In my head a voice is singing that Finch could be “China Mieville’s The City and The City done right”, but I know better than to listen to the voices again.
That thar City of Saints still sells like hotcakes in the US, so apparently it’s not too weird.
Key to the Squid biblio is only read the annotated entries.
A Glossary is meant to be read like a Glossary…not like a story.
NR–Finch is out from Grove Atlantic in the UK in August.
Thanks for the review!
Somehow only just tonight discovered that you’re doing book reviews. Looking forward to reading this one after your post. Have you read “The Magicians” by Lev Grossman. Highly rec’d. Take care!
@N.R. Alexander Thanks for the head’s up. I’ve just picked up copies of both Shriek and Finch, and I’ve got them in the pipeline for February. I’m pretty excited. And just make sure to only listen to the right voices, whichever those are…
@Martin Lake I’m happy to hear that City of Saints is doing well! Perhaps I don’t give the general reading populace enough credit. I don’t know if you’ve ever read Danielewski’s House of Leaves, but it was stunning, and I could never convince a single friend of mine to give it a shot, as it was so atypically structured. Maybe I need different friends, either more open to experimentation or more easily persuaded to follow my advice.
@H. S. Moore Hola, haven’t heard from you in a dog’s age, though I keep seeing pictures of your lovely child on my Facebook feed! I haven’t read Grossman yet, but whenever I go to The Tattered Cover, his novel manages to jump in front of me. I don’t think I’ll be able to resist the temptation for much longer.
I first encountered Jeff VanderMeer when I came across his blog and I enjoyed it so much that I tried City of Saints and Madmen. I especially enjoyed City of Saints and Madmen because I loved its postmodern literary techniques in addition to the wonderful city of Ambergris. I immediately acquired Shriek and Finch and am looking forward to reading them this year. I read House of Leaves when it first came out in 2000 and re-read it a few months ago and again enjoyed its postmodern approach as well as the scariest house I ever encountered. I would argue that House of Leaves suffered more than City from an “unwillingness to remove material that serves little purpose other than to amuse the author” and add that this imposition of the author’s authority, or whims depending on your perspective, seems to me to be part of the whole postmodern oeuvre. In any case I look forward to your reviews of Shriek and Finch as well as Wind Up Girl which just recently arrived on my tbr pile. Thanks for the thoughtful review.
@Moo Oh, I would agree with you that House of Leaves is WAY more self-indulgent than City of Saints and Madmen. Some of the techniques Danielewski employed, while fun to read, were really over the top. The chapter on labyrinths, using footnotes on footnotes on footnotes was painful, though a cool way to communicate the sensation of a maze utilizing the written word. Also, during the exploration of the endless hallways and the massive pit, the tricks he plays where you are rotating the book to read, very gimmicky; that section felt more like an art exhibit than a novel.
I’m looking back on House of Leaves after close to a decade, but I remember it being either very vivid or very dry, with little in-between; a lot of that depended on which of the narrators was speaking at a given moment. Johnny Truant was a fantastic character to experience life with, and I remember the letters from his institutionalized mother terrified me with their obsessive intensity.